How does the camera behave Xiaomi Mi 11. We always say that experiential reviews, those made on your skin, are the best reviews. Scores and rankings can be indicative for targeting a user but should not dictate the law. Today let's go see what DxOMark he said of the photographic sector of the top of the standard range of the latest Mi family. We remind you that recently the same portal reviewed the Ultra variant that has become the absolute queen of photos.
Xiaomi Mi 11's camera how is it going? The specifications are at the top and the performance too: DxOMark is pleasantly impressed with the details
Xiaomi Mi 11 shows up on DxOMark with a little delay compared to the others. In fact, the Ultra variant, although it came out later, was reviewed earlier. The reason is clear: a photographic sector of that level could not wait. But let's see the little brother how he behaved. Generally fine, although the score doesn't get the device right to the top. Speaking of numbers, Xiaomi Mi 11 scores a total of 120 points, placing itself next to Google Pixel 5 but far below Mi 10, its predecessor.
In general the performance is very good but what brings down the score and therefore does not allow Xiaomi Mi 11 to rise in the ranking is it zoom meeting. This, with a score of just 59 points, points out the lack of a telephoto-type sensor. This is a shame since we remember that Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra still holds the record in this category. Undoubtedly, if your predecessor was successful in this, nothing more than one will be needed OTA update to fix the shot. But up to a certain point: the television continues to be missing.
On the contrary, the feature that most impressed the DxOMark testers are the details, so much so that in the texture category the device took almost the maximum. In low light conditions the noise makes itself heard, but the result is definitely acceptable. Regarding the self-timer, the team admits that it is not the top of the category: It is usually fast and accurate in bright light, but can slow down a bit in low light.
Regarding the sector video lesson, DxOMark admits it is one of the best on the square. Although the device can record video at a maximum resolution of 8K, the team of testers decided to go as far as possible 4K is 30 fps. The decision was dictated by the fact that the results were better. Too bad, we would have liked to see a difference between 4 and 8K. Autofocus is fast, but sometimes the system makes weird choices about the subject and focuses poorly.
