In such a multinational technological reality, every detail in terms of innovations can unleash a storm. Recently, Xiaomi responded to claims made by Huawei, regarding their advanced technology “Dragon Bone Hinge“. For those who don't know it, it's the foldable smartphone folding technology of the company. The dispute focuses on the design and functionality of the latter.
Xiaomi defends its innovation from Huawei's accusatory words
In the recent exchange of statements in the technology industry, Xiaomi responded firmly to Huawei's claims. The controversy has flared up around the hinge of foldables, a crucial aspect in the design of foldable devices. Xiaomi has clarified that their system “Dragon Bone Hinge” is a result of internal research and development, clearly distinguishing itself from the solutions proposed by Huawei.
The hinge of Xiaomi's Mix Fold 3 introduces a three-level mechanism with a complex and innovative structure, designed to offer greater precision and resistance. This approach contrasts with the technology proposed by Huawei, based on a different hinge design.
The technical differences are significant: while Huawei employs a traditional approach, Xiaomi has opted for one more complex and potentially more effective solution. This choice reflects the Chinese company's philosophy of constantly seeking innovation and superior quality.
Below are the words of the brand, taken from the official Chinese press release that you can find at this link:
"Recently, Mr. Yu Chengdong unfairly targeted our company with untrue statements regarding our “Dragon Bone Hinge“, which are grossly inconsistent with the facts. We want to clarify as follows:
The "Dragon Bone Hinge” is a new generation of folding hinge internally developed by Xiaomi Group. This is the first in the industry to introduce a 3-level structure, which leads to superior, more precise and reliable bending quality.
Both the design concept and mechanical structure are completely different from the so-called “double keel” mentioned by Mr. Yu Chengdong. After having examined the technical materials released by his company and the public patents, and having carried out a practical analysis, the so-called "double keel” uses a “2-level with 3 components and 4 joints” design, while Xiaomi's mechanical structure uses an innovative “3-level with 5 components and 7 joints”.
The company then goes on to say:
Xiaomi patented the system in question on September 18, 2020, obtaining the patent on January 5, 2021, and it was first applied in August 2023 on the Xiaomi MIX Fold 3. Instead, the technology mentioned by Mr. Yu Chengdong was patented on December 13, 2019 and only made public on June 18, 2021. This shows that Mr. Yu Chengdong's claims are completely baseless.
Furthermore, according to publicly available information, the patent application for Yu Chengdong's company's structure was filed on October 29, 2021, and only made public on May 5, 2023, without any confirmation of having been licensed or put into production. until today.
We ask Mr. Yu Chengdong to adhere to the fundamental principles of "scientificity and rigor" and refrain from defaming colleagues and deceiving the public.
In short, the debate is not limited to mere technology, but it extends to public perception and corporate image. Xiaomi's reaction highlights the importance of intellectual property and mutual respect in the industry. Their defense is not just a matter of technical specifications, but also a symbol of their commitment to innovation and integrity.
For the moment there have been no new official statements, but undoubtedly press releases will follow which will clarify the matter. It is worth mentioning that the two companies have recently reached an agreement regarding alleged patent infringement
On offer on Amazon
